[SR-Users] Rtpproxy re-INVITE handling
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Thu Aug 30 09:51:04 CEST 2012
Hello,
if your config it is based on the default one, the Route header for
within dialog requests is marked by a parameter, nat=yes, that is used
to decide whether to do rtpproxy or not.
So, if you have a custom config, check the default one for the nat
traversal handling part.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 8/30/12 12:39 AM, Spencer Thomason wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm using Kamailio 3.2.4 for NAT traversal using rtpproxy_manage() in
> a largely stock script. Everything works great until the far end (on
> a public ip) sends a t.38 re-INVITE. The 200OK from the NATed UAC
> then doesn't trigger rtpproxy and the private IP in the sdp causes the
> fax to fail. Any help handling these re-INVITEs would be greatly
> appreciated. I'm happy to post traces if that helps describe the
> situation. The network topology looks like this:
>
> NATed UAC -> Kamailio on a public IP -> UAS on a public IP
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Spencer
>
>
> /Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120830/e2a572d7/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list