[SR-Users] rtpproxy module issue

[phillman25]

Dear SamyGo

Thanks for your response.

Yes you're right a folder called rtpproxy.so was left in the
directory /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k that had not been updated to
the date kamailio was compiled and once i deleted it everything was then
ok. I checked in directory /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules and there i
found a new rtpproxy.so folder that was updated on the installation date.
Seems like rtpproxy.so in the new version is installed
in /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules and not
in /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k. Is that correct?

Well everything is working ok now!

Thanks for your assistance!
Regards
Phillip



> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:29:35 +0500
> From: SamyGo <govoiper at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy module issue
> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
>         Users   Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJUJwtjB7fmm1pa60wJMLPPte=
> Qu_AeZ1z2aqysQaZch_Pb+dQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> Though not an expert, I got few things in mind for your case. In the
> upgrade process the modules folder remain the same ? right ! if that is so
> is there any chances that the new installation skipped installation of
> newer rtpproxy module and hence the old version rtpproxy module could've
> been left in place. That could be a reason for not identifying the older
> module.
> This whole speculation could be wrong if the newer version supports the
> older version modules.
>
> BR
> Sammy
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:56 AM, phillman25 <phillman25 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear List
> >
> > I have just upgraded from kamailio V3.2.2 to kamailio V 3.3.1
> > However, when trying to start kamailio its giving me the below error:
> >
> >
> > ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not open
> module
> > </usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so>:
> > /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so: undefined symbol:
> qm_realloc
> > : <core> [cfg.y:3591]: parse error in config file
> > /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 245, column 12-24: failed to
> > load module
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know why rtpproxy module cannot be loaded?
> >
> >
> > This is the output of ldd /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/rtpproxy.so:
> >
> >
> >
> > shell-init: error retrieving current directory: getcwd: cannot access
> > parent directories: No such file or directory
> >         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00276000)
> >         libkmi.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkmi.so.1 (0x00b64000)
> >         libkcore.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/kamailio/libkcore.so.1
> (0x00768000)
> >         libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0x00277000)
> >         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00114000)
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards Phillip
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/919fdda5/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:45:57 +0200
> From: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Is Route Header in SIP Invite Mandatory?
> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
>         Users   Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Message-ID: <502CC155.5030603 at pernau.at>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 16.08.2012 09:40, Apoorv Khare wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Does Kamailio has a mandatory requirement for SIP Invite to have Route
> > header? Although RFC-3261 doesn't have.
>
> Kamailio does not have a requirement on Route headers. Although you can
> check manually for a Router header and handle requests different.
>
> > My requirement is to take out route header from the client if I do that
> > I don't see PRACK being send out from Kamilio to Media GW which causes
> > call drop eventually in 15sec. Any thoughts..........
>
> Maybe you can re-phrase your problem. I didn't understand it.
>
> regards
> Klaus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> End of sr-users Digest, Vol 87, Issue 52
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120816/a67f17f9/attachment.htm>