[SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

[Olle E. Johansson]

24 apr 2012 kl. 16:04 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:

> Hello,
> 
> On 4/24/12 3:55 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> 24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code is really misleading for such case . So I searched further in 4xx class, base rfc and other extensions, and could not find anything.
>>> 
>> You propably want to add a reason header or something to explain for the poor guy running wireshark.
>> The error code is not all.
> I would do if I was developing the hard/softphone. So I was actually wondering how to detect such situation based on the reply received in the proxy.
> 
> Btw, what Asterisk/Sems does in this situation (just for the developers of such end points here :-) ), any special hint-header added?

No for Asterisk. It should, really.

/O