[SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0)
Asgaroth
00asgaroth00 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 11:47:54 CEST 2011
Hi Daniel,
On 26/10/2011 04:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> the purpose with three states (active, inactive and disabled) was not
> to relate probing to selection of gateways, as one may want to have
> even active gateways in probing mode to detect when they go down. So,
> in other words, if probing mode is not checked when a gateways is
> selected, but only if the gateway has the state active.
>
OK, so, before I continue on testeing between 3.2 and 3.3 dev branch,
can you confirm that my understanding of the states are correct:
Assuming ds_probing_mode = 0 (Only send "ping" requests when destination
is in probing state)
AX (Active)
[*] Used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
[*] No ping probes sent to destination
AP (Active-Probing)
[*] Used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
[*] Ping probes sent to destination
[*] When reply to ping probe is recieved, state for gateway chages
to AX (Active)
IX (Inactive)
[*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
[*] No ping probes sent to destination
IP (Inactive-Probing)
[*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
[*] Ping probes sent to destination
[*] When reply to ping probe is recieved, state for gateway chages
to AX (Active)
DX (Disabled)
[*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
[*] No ping probes sent to destination
Is the above true for both version 3.2.x and devel branch?
Just for ease of syntax in routing script, is it possible to do:
ds_mark_dst("ip") = Mark Inactive-Probing
ds_mark_dst("ap") = Mark Active-Probing
in both version 3.2.x and devel branch? Similar to fifo ds_set_state
command?
Once I understand these correctly, I can continue testing the 2 versions
and see the differences. I suspect v3.2.x does *not* use gateway in
ds_select_* when destination is in AP mode. But will confirm that with
testing if my above understanding is correct.
Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20111026/c8f15b2d/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list