[SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Fri May 27 11:44:01 CEST 2011


The debate from my point of view was the _architecture of the 
protocols_: sip vs msrp -- read it to some extent like: structure of the 
messages. You go very much to specifics on existing sip for voice -- 
like it is unimaginable to have some requests (for content of 
communication) within a dialog following different path than INVITE and 
BYE (or the requests that control the session) when it is more optimal.

I provided just leads to similar mechanisms, not the specs of how it 
must be done. It is nothing I should argument, what you summarized it is 
what you extracted/understood, but it is not what I meant it must be.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 5/27/11 10:41 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla<miconda at gmail.com>:
>> I wonder if you really read to understand or just spot 'single concepts' to
>> make them out of the context in order to reply something. That is endless
>> and topic breaker.
> Hi Daniel, that is not my aim.
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda




More information about the sr-users mailing list