[SR-Users] OT: are there still asymmetric SIP clients?

Sergey Okhapkin sos at sokhapkin.dyndns.org
Wed Jun 22 16:00:12 CEST 2011


I use a separate IP address to accept calls from such SIP clients and do not 
check for NAT on those calls.

On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> So what do you use as nat_check? Only the received IP address?
> 
> regards
> Klaus
> 
> Am 22.06.2011 15:36, schrieb Sergey Okhapkin:
> > A lot of Cisco (not linksys) SIP equipment is asymmetric.
> > 
> > On Wednesday 22 June 2011, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> 
> >> Just a small survey: Are you still using NAT detection checks? I prefer
> >> to apply NAT traversal always (never trust the contact header) which of
> >> course only works if all the clients are symmetric.
> >> 
> >> Thus - do you still see asymmetric SIP clients?
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> Klaus
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> >> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users




More information about the sr-users mailing list