[SR-Users] Best way to handle OPTIONS message with Max-Forwards of 0
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jun 8 20:22:37 CEST 2011
Anyway - not standard conform but efficient (put somewhere in the beginning)
force_rport();
if (is_method("OPTIONS")) {
sl_send_reply("200","OK");
exit;
}
# sipura/linksys keepalive
if (is_method("NOTIFY")) {
if ( search("^Event: keep-alive") ) {
sl_send_reply("200","Keep Alive");
exit;
}
}
# ignore requests generated by sipvicious
# User-Agent: friendly-scanner
if ($ua == "friendly-scanner") {
exit;
}
regards
Klaus
Am 08.06.2011 18:28, schrieb Sean O'Donnell:
> Hi:
>
> We're running kamailio 1.5.5 as part of our VoIP infrastructure. One of our
> service providers
> has an SBC that sends an OPTIONS messages with a Max-Forwards of 0.
>
> Looking at RFC 3261 section 11, this seems to be a valid method of forcing the
> proxy to respond to the OPTIONS.
> However, the standard initial sanity checks in most proxy configs will reject
> this message. I fixed our script
> by changing to this:
>
> # initial sanity checks -- messages with
> # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
> if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
> if( method != "OPTIONS" ) {
> sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
> return;
> };
> };
> if ( msg:len > max_len ) {
> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
> return;
> };
>
> but does anyone have a better solution?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean O'Donnell
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
More information about the sr-users
mailing list