[SR-Users] Kamailio: 500 Server error occurred (19/SL).
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Wed Jul 20 11:47:33 CEST 2011
Hello,
On 7/19/11 12:10 PM, Max Doronin wrote:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> I think your guess about failure_route is correct. Here is the related
> piece of config. Actually I can not find any append_branch() call in
> config (which is not originally developed by me).
>
> failure_route[1] {
> if (t_was_cancelled()) {
> exit;
> }
>
> if (t_check_status("408|403|404|488|480|415|50[0-4]")) {
> if (next_gw()) {
> t_on_failure("1");
> route(6);
> }
> else
> {
> route(6);
you should not call route(6) in the above line, but rather exit -- there
was no next gw to try.
Cheers,
Daniel
> }
> }
> }
>
> route[6] {
> if (!t_relay()) {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
> exit;
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Max.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> On 7/13/11 5:51 PM, Max Doronin wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I have strange behavior on my Kamailio-1.5.1-notls instance.
>
> I have LCR and TM modules enabled.For a particular destination
> I have
> 4 routes to try. When I call to non-existing number, it tries
> - route 1 (404 Not Found)
> - route 2 (404 Not Found)
> - route 3 (503 Service unavailable)
>
> And the problem is with the last 503.
>
> Kamailio ACKs it, immediately drops these 2 lines into syslog
> Jul 13 04:14:47 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23572]:
> ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for forwarding
> Jul 13 04:14:47 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[23572]:
> ERROR:tm:w_t_relay:
> t_forward_nonack failed
> And sends
> SIP/2.0 500 Server error occurred (19/SL).
> To the call originator.
>
> 30 microseconds later it sends
> SIP/2.0 500 Service Unavailable.
> to the originator again
>
> Latter 500 looks like the relayed original "503 Service
> unavailable".
> I think so because the Reason header is the same:
> Reason: SIP;cause=503;text="Service
> Unavailable";icodetext="NoCircuitAvailable";iintcode=10034;isubsystem=3.
>
> Obviously call is terminated.
>
> I noticed that that last peer rewrites my Via headers like this:
> Original:
> ==
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 187.45.214.132;branch=z9hG4bK3dac.fae9b793.2.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.2.33:5622;received=49.49.59.23;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-a6ba40014f97fb7c-1---d8754z-;rport=23832.
> ==
>
> Rewritten
> ==
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 187.45.214.132;received=187.45.214.132;branch=z9hG4bK3dac.fae9b793.2,SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.2.33:5622;received=49.49.59.23;branch=z9hG4b
> ==
>
> I tried to modify via1_matching parameter (1 -> 0) but no
> changes.
>
> My questions are:
> - What can be the reason of that 500 with 19/SL
> - Can kamailio properly handle this 1 line Via header?
> - What can be the reason of that "t_forward_nonack: no branch
> for forwarding"?
>
>
> it seems you try to forward one more time, but there is no new
> branch where to send. I guess there is some issue in the
> failure_route, like calling t_relay() even if the new branch is
> not added. If you can paste it here, I can tell more clear if
> something is wrong there.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
> http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110720/9ad6b61c/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list