[SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 41

Henrik Aagaard Sørensen henrikaagaardsorensen at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 12:40:13 CEST 2011 

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:00 PM, <sr-users-request at lists.sip-router.org>wrote:

> Send sr-users mailing list submissions to
>        sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        sr-users-request at lists.sip-router.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        sr-users-owner at lists.sip-router.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Henrik Aagaard S?rensen)
>   2. Re: dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Alex Balashov)
>   3. Re: dbaliases for ring groups, possible? (Morten Isaksen)
>   4. Re: xcap server - http load?balancer: xcap authentication
>      problem (laura testi)
>   5. Re: bypass rtp traffic. (MingHon)
>   6. Re: AVPs missing in onreply_route (Sebastian Damm)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:41:16 +0200
> From: Henrik Aagaard S?rensen   <henrikaagaardsorensen at gmail.com>
> Subject: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
> To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> Message-ID:
>        <CAGH8SebPV=xz1n6Jp=M5fjnUhK0t=Za2aWd_jrpzbjdpdejatw at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can call
> one
> number and several different numbers will then be called. The first to pick
> up the call gets it.
>
> I've tried to an alias in my dbaliases table in MySQL, but I can only make
> it possible to call different numbers for the same user. In a way the other
> way around then what I thought.
>
> Is it somehow possible to call one number and then having Kamailio call
> several different numbers /users?
>
> As I'm very newbee to Kamailio it would be nice with a more detailed
> answer,
> then perhaps just "Yes, use the module ...".
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/5a654b2a/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 03:43:35 -0400
> From: Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
> To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> Message-ID: <4E1FEFA7.4000001 at evaristesys.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 07/15/2011 03:41 AM, Henrik Aagaard S?rensen wrote:
>
> > I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can
> > call one number and several different numbers will then be called. The
> > first to pick up the call gets it.
>
> What do you mean by "user"?  Are you talking about multiple
> registrants?  Or are you talking about multiple "numbers" redirected
> back out of some PSTN gateway?
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 260 Peachtree Street NW
> Suite 2200
> Atlanta, GA 30303
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Fax: +1-404-961-1892
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
>
>
>
Dear Alex.

I'm talking about multiple numbers to a PTSN gateway. I have a carrier which
provides sim cards with different GSM telephone numbers. I would like to
make a number, say XXXXXX, when called to it would ring on YYYYYY, ZZZZZZ
etc. on mobile phones.


>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:48:45 +0200
> From: Morten Isaksen <misak at misak.dk>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] dbaliases for ring groups, possible?
> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
>        Users   Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <CAAyFOkGpzPzDJx+f2NKnsJ5gkz72xZbAKKtCF8ppkenGPPq7iw at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> Try to look at serial and parallel forking. You can read more at
> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/tm.html#tm.serial_forking
>
> /Morten
>

I've looked at that but couldn't get it to work with different numbers etc.
and a dynamic way (or static for that matter).



>
> 2011/7/15 Henrik Aagaard S?rensen <henrikaagaardsorensen at gmail.com>:
> > I've read somewhere about using dbaliases for ring groups. So I can call
> one
> > number and several different numbers will then be called. The first to
> pick
> > up the call gets it.
> > I've tried to an alias in my dbaliases table in MySQL, but I can only
> make
> > it possible to call different numbers for the same user. In a way the
> other
> > way around then what I?thought.
> > Is it somehow possible to call one number and then having Kamailio call
> > several different numbers /users?
> > As I'm very newbee to Kamailio it would be nice with a more detailed
> answer,
> > then perhaps just "Yes, use the module ...".
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Morten Isaksen
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:26:30 +0200
> From: laura testi <lau.testi at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] xcap server - http load?balancer: xcap
>        authentication problem
> To: Henning Westerholt <henning.westerholt at 1und1.de>
> Cc: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> Message-ID:
>        <CAHFjjJPY8THunDp+6UPA5m9XZMdkh4t3igQsHb_4G9vp9cChcg at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
> we have checked the presence extension for DB_MODE only in the master
> branch. But it's not complete DB_ONLY mode, it seems that it still uses the
> cache for active_watchers in write through mode. Is there any reason for
> it?
> That can still make problem for the scalability for the multiple presence
> servers, because if an presence event (either SIP or XCAP) of an active
> subscription in the cache of one presence server, goes to another presence
> server, can still cause the problem even the DB is sync with the cache.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Laura
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Henning Westerholt <
> henning.westerholt at 1und1.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 30 June 2011, laura testi wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > pres_refresh_watchers triggered by xcap message in another presence
> > server:
> > > with the hashing over to uri in dispacther workaround, it seems solve
> the
> > > first problem for SIP/SIMPLE messages, but we have the same kind of
> > > problem for xcap message. For example, a subscription is in a local
> cache
> > > of one server, and the incomming xcap message related to the same
> > > subscription goes to another server, and this message trigger the
> > > pres_update_watchers pres_refresh_watchers presence functions from the
> > > configuration script in the server where there is no subscription in
> the
> > > local cache, then it send the wrong notify message. This can happen
> when
> > a
> > > user add/remove a contact, and the SUBSCRIBE goes to one server and
> XCAP
> > > PUT goes to another server. Unfortunately there is no DB mode only in
> > > PRESENCE module like REGISTRAR module. The fallback to db can't help
> > > either for point 1 or for point 2. Can you help please?
> >
> > Hi laura,
> >
> > i can't comment on the other question, but Marius B did some presence
> > extensions in master branch a few month ago, that the presence module now
> > supports a db_mode module parameter including DB_ONLY. It will be in
> > kamailio
> > 3.2, maybe you can have a look to the master branch and backport it, if
> you
> > need it faster.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Henning
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/aa278480/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:36:01 +0800
> From: MingHon <gminghon at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] bypass rtp traffic.
> To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> Message-ID:
>        <CACRMveeJKYnsdBFzqbQPfyoC1uTLaEMUo-F-+MzMReNn9GuWTg at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> after asterisk reinvite i get status 491: request pending.
> after few seconds i hang up both UA then one of the UA will start ring.
>
> please advice.
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> MingHon
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/8f7207c0/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:42:36 +0200
> From: Sebastian Damm <damm at sipgate.de>
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] AVPs missing in onreply_route
> To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -
>        Users   Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> Message-ID:
>        <CABkWSFzXwLs3tCzL-KLNep6jQ3B6ynNzk23v6qG4PvDL9+gxvA at mail.gmail.com
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Klaus Darilion
> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> > The named reply routes are only executed if t_on_reply() was called for
> > the request. This reply route will be executed after the default
> > reply-route. It is triggered by tm module.
>
> I just inserted a new reply_route, which just prints out some
> variables (and does avp_print). From what I see in the logs now, the
> named route is executed before the default reply_route. And there are
> no AVPs in the named route. Actually, I don't even need the AVPs in
> the replies, I need them to be there, when the 200 OK comes in or in
> failure route when the call is cancelled. In both cases the AVPs are
> <null> if i directly address them.
>
> Any more ideas?
>
> Best regards,
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> End of sr-users Digest, Vol 74, Issue 41
> ****************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110715/017ff4e4/attachment.htm>

More information about the sr-users mailing list