[SR-Users] acc table versions

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 7/8/11 9:46 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just as a note: I find it a bit strange that acc (4) and missed_calls
> (3) have different version numbers although they are identical. Anyway,
> it seems that acc module does not make version checks at all.
indeed in some cases the version table is not checked. For 
acc/missed_calls makes practically no sense since it requires 
personalization (via db_extra parameter) to get something useful.

Not sure if the version can be removed for these tables, since the sql 
scripts are generated from xml files, but maybe we should set the value 
to 0 to indicate that is not used.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda