[SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy/rtpproxy_offer/answer not replacing ip addr.

MingHon gminghon at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 04:01:53 CEST 2011


Hi Ovidiu,

Thanks for the info.

But why the command still available in the doc.

http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/rtpproxy.html#id3024166

anyway i will try the trunk version.

but may i know which version?

is this ok?

# svn co http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.5kamailio

Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
MingHon

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:

> Can you try the trunk version?
> I remember fixing a bug related to the external IP, but I don't
> remember if it is available on a stable version.
>
> Regards,
> Ovidiu sas
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:16 AM, MingHon <gminghon at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Carsten,
> > I tried RTPProxy using external address. It work out from the box without
> > any problem.
> > UA successfully registered and RTP-Traffic relay work.
> > Yup but now im trying to put the Box behind the nat.
> > i refer to this
> > thread
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-June/069223.html
> > im able to put rtpproxy behind nat but need to modify the SDP body put in
> > the proper ip address.
> > so im trying to use force_rtp_proxy("co","external-address"); to modify
> the
> > (c=) and (o=) in SDP body.
> > but in the SDP body i didnt see any changes of the ip address i tried
> adding
> > several flags f,r,w but no luck.
> > if i double my line  "force_rtp_proxy("co","external-address");"
> > in my SDP body i will get double private ip (c=192.168.1.3192.168.1.3)
> and
> > (o=192.168.1.3192.168.1.3)
> > thanks in advance,
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > MingHon
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110707/93040678/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list