[SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route

[Bernhard Suttner]

Hi,

that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)

One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the request was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?

Best regards,
Bernhard 

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalashov at evaristesys.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.suttner at winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route


> Yes.
> 
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 260 Peachtree Street NW
> Suite 2200
> Atlanta, GA 30303
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Fax: +1-404-961-1892
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
> 
> On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" <bernhard.suttner at winet.ch 
>  > wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I  
> > mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route 
> > [NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is  
> > possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally  
> > called from the main route { ... }
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Bernhard
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing  
> > list
> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>