[SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address

Graham Wooden graham at g-rock.net
Sat Jan 29 18:01:29 CET 2011


Stagg, 

While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry
in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.

I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP.  I believe
with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.

This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am wondering
if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed because of
these look ups.  Everything that I have read so far is that the gw_name is
just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it. Boo.

-graham


On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, "GP Wooden" <graham at g-rock.net> wrote:

> Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
> like the gw_name.
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Stagg Shelton" <stagg at vocalcloud.com>
> Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
> Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
> To: <sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> 
> Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
> plans?  If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
> 
>            if (next_gw()) {
>                  # prepare for lcr failover
>                  t_on_failure("2");
>                  if($rd=="aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa")
>                  {
>                    xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for Some Rate Plan");
>                    force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
>                  }
>                  else
>                  {
>                    xlog ("L_INFO", "This is a request for another rate
> plan");
>                    force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
>                  };
>                  route(2);
>            } else {
>              xlog("No gateways found!");
> 
> 
> Stagg
> 
> On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
>> > sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
>> carrier).
>> > This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
>> >
>> > I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
>> >
>> > failure_route [2] {
>> > .
>> > .
>> >      if (next_gw()) {
>> >          if ( name = 'gw_name') {
>> >              force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
>> >          } else {
>> >              # just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
>> > else.
>> >          }
>> >          t_on_failure("2");
>> >          route(19);
>> >      }
>> > .
>> > .
>> > .
>> > }
>> >
>> > What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
>> > by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
>> > two ratedecks.
>> >
>> > Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
>> >
>> > Thanks all,
>> >
>> > -graham
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110129/5f134184/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list