[SR-Users] Return code after fr_inv_timer hit

Mino Haluz mino.haluz at gmail.com
Tue Jan 18 13:34:09 CET 2011


I changed the flag, and added:

        if (t_check_status("408|480")) {
            setflag(4);
            t_reply("480","Temporarily unavailable");
            exit;
        }

But with no difference ..

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Not sure if it is documented, but iirc, failed transactions accounting
> reports each stage of a failed forwarding (i.e., each final negative reply
> received for a transactions is reported).
>
> Try:
>
> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 4)
>
> And in failure route before t_reply(480...) do
>
> setflag(4);
>
> See if this way is reported only once.
>
> Be sure flag 4 is not used for something else, of if it used then use an
> unused one.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 1/18/11 11:41 AM, Mino Haluz wrote:
>>
>> These are my modparams.
>>
>> modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
>> modparam("acc", "report_cancels",     1)
>> modparam("acc", "report_ack",         0)
>> modparam("acc", "early_media",        0)
>>
>> modparam("acc", "log_level",          5)
>> modparam("acc", "log_flag",           1)
>> modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag",    1)
>>
>> modparam("acc", "radius_config",
>> "/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf")         # This is the
>> location of the configuration file of radius client
>> modparam("acc", "radius_flag",        1)
>> modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 1)
>>
>> Packet 408 is not sent to the caller, ony my 480.
>> And this is my failroute once more:
>>
>> failure_route[FAIL_ONE] {
>>         if (t_is_canceled()) {
>>                 exit;
>>         }
>>         if (t_check_status("408|480")) {
>>             t_reply("480","Temporarily unavailable");
>>             exit;
>>         }
>> }
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <miconda at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you have failed transaction accounting enabled?
>>>
>>> Can you watch the sip traffic (ngrep, wireshark), is the 408 sent to
>>> caller
>>> as well?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 1/18/11 10:54 AM, Mino Haluz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So
>>>>
>>>> failure_route[FAIL_ONE] {
>>>>  ...
>>>>  if (t_check_status("408")) {
>>>>      t_reply("480","Temporarily Unavailable");
>>>>      exit;
>>>>   }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Thank you, but I am encountering particular problem, that there are 2
>>>> messages stored in the radius, the original 408 and my 480 Temporarily
>>>> unavailabe. Can I force to do not write that original 408 to radius?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Klaus Darilion
>>>> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>    wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 14.01.2011 10:28, schrieb Mino Haluz:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to force kamailio to send another code as Request timeout
>>>>>> when fr invite timeout is hit. Is there some nice way how to achieve
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> or I have to edit the code ? :(
>>>>>
>>>>> activate a failure route: t_on_failure("foo")
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> then in failure route check for the status (e.g. 408):
>>>>>
>>>>> failure_route[foo] {
>>>>>  ...
>>>>>  if (t_check_status("487")) {
>>>>>      t_reply("499","or what ever you want");
>>>>>      exit;
>>>>>   }
>>>>>  ...
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>> klaus
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
>>> Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
>>> http://www.asipto.com
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
> Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
> http://www.asipto.com
>
>



More information about the sr-users mailing list