[SR-Users] AVP Error in version 3.1.0
Jijo
realjijo at gmail.com
Sun Feb 20 18:53:49 CET 2011
Yes this happens in a testing environment..
I got your point, we saved after t-relay to send the message faster as db save can cause delay.
We will make the changes as per your suggestion .
Thanks
Jijo
On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:11 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is any particular reason to do the processing after t_relay() ? You can do the save before, since it is the same register message.
>
> Also, are you getting this in a testing environment while using tools like sipp to simulate traffic?
>
> Starting with 3.0, the AVPs (which are associated with the message and transaction in this case) become available in onreply_route[3] (in 1.x that was a config option for tm module), so if it is fast reply, it my happen that the avps are no longer available in the script after t_relay().
>
> As a recommended rule, it is better to avoid using avps after t_relay() - this function creates the transaction and forwards the message. From there on, the avps are in the hands of tm module, which moves them to onreply_route or failure_route, depending on your config file.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 2/16/11 4:28 PM, Jijo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Please find the code and corresponding error trace. This happens only for 1 subscriber randomly out of 2000 subscribers. This can be reproduced consistently also.
>>
>> route(1)
>> {
>> :
>> :
>> :
>>
>> # -----------------------------------------------------------------
>> # Registration handling dynamic endpoints
>> # -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> $avp(reg_contact)= $ct;
>> $var(reg_contact)= $ct;
>> t_on_reply("3");
>>
>> if(!is_avp_set("$avp(reg_contact)"))
>> xlog("L_ERR", "R1 - not set the reg_contact3 F=$fu T=$tu Ct=$ct IP=$si CI=$ci var_contact:$var(reg_contact)\n");
>>
>> # relay
>> if(!t_relay_to("0x3"))
>> {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "R1/R10 - Registration failed - M=$rm F=$fu T=$tu CT=$ct IP=$si CI=$ci\n");
>> append_to_reply("Warning: 399 $Ri - R1 - Registration failed: fail in relay in R10.\r\n");
>> sl_reply_error();
>> exit;
>> }
>>
>> if(!is_avp_set("$avp(reg_contact)"))
>> xlog("L_ERR", "R1 - not set the reg_contact4 F=$fu T=$tu Ct=$ct IP=$si CI=$ci var_contact:$var(reg_contact)\n");
>>
>> xlog("L_ERR", "R1 - Saving Registration-2 save to location F=$fu T=$tu Ct=$ct IP=$si CI=$ci reg_ct:$avp(reg_contact)\n");
>>
>> if(!isflagset(28) && is_avp_set("$avp(reg_contact)")) # Check if we need to save it in location table
>> {
>> if(!save("location","0x02"))
>> {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "R1 - Location save for Registration failed - M=$rm F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si CT=$ct\n");
>> }
>> }
>>
>> LOGS for the error condtion.
>>
>>
>> 2011-02-15T12:19:30-05:00 [err] sipserver: ERROR: <script>: R1 - not set the reg_contact4 F=sip:5614510478 at 10.235.86.54:5060;transport=UDP T=sip:5614510478 at 10.235.86.54:5060;transport=UDP Ct=<sip:5614510478 at 10.235.204.5:5060> IP=10.235.204.5 CI=119ac328-4cceb0a-13c4-7fa55-76a2903a-7fa55 var_contact:<sip:5614510478 at 10.235.204.5:5060>
>> 2011-02-15T12:19:30-05:00 [err] sipserver: ERROR: <script>: R1 - Saving Registration-2 save to location F=sip:5614510478 at 10.235.86.54:5060;transport=UDP T=sip:5614510478 at 10.235.86.54:5060;transport=UDP Ct=<sip:5614510478 at 10.235.204.5:5060> IP=10.235.204.5 CI=119ac328-4cceb0a-13c4-7fa55-76a2903a-7fa55 reg_ct:<null>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> it is not clear for me what you tried to do. Can you paste here the parts of the config file that are relevant for the case? Do you relay the REGISTER?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/11 1:17 AM, Jijo wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> On register we store the contact in an avp variable and do a t_relay(). After t_relay() the $avp variable becomes null.
>>> I printed the value before after t_relay() to determine this behavior.
>>> This happens only on registration load test around 2000 subcribers with ( 4 REGISTER/sec). This happens only for one subscriber out of 2000 subscribers.
>>>
>>> I did the similar test with $var and its working fine.
>>>
>>> Anybody observed similar behavior with avp? This was working in kamailio 1.4 version. We did the upgrade recently to 3.1.0 and started observing this issue.
>>>
>>> How do we debug this issue.?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jijo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://www.asipto.com
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://www.asipto.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110220/097b7a8e/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list