[SR-Users] force_send_socket and IPv6

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 18:00:02 CET 2011


Hello,

is the ipv6 address in between square brackets (can you give exact usage 
of the foce_send_socket())? It should work as the bridging ipv4-ipv6 is 
using the same mechanism -- may be an issue with the exported function 
to config, though. Can you try to set $fs as alternative to 
force_send_socket()?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 12/14/11 5:19 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 05:16 PM, Andreas Granig wrote:
>> Is it possible to use force_send_socket() with an IPv6 address in
>> Kamailio 3.1? I get the error
>>
>> 	ERROR: fix_actions: force_send_socket: could not resolve
>> X:X:X:X:X:X:X:X:5060
> Actually it doesn't include the 5060, so it really says:
>
> 	ERROR: fix_actions: force_send_socket: could not resolve X:X:X:X:X:X:X:X
>
> Sorry if that caused a confusion, my mistake when copy/pasting it.
>
> Andreas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20111214/bcb74e20/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list