[SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello Juha.

I’m observing something like this : (these are “Simmultaneous calls” graphs)









As you can see the GW05, Gw06, Gw09 and GW10 seems to share the load
equally, as expected.. but I was also expecting a little more load in the
GW02 ad Gw03.

They seems to me very underloaded (according to the LCR weight column).

Is this normal?...



What can you see from the graphs?

Thanks in advance,



Regards,

Ricardo.-



-----Mensaje original-----
De: sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org [mailto:
sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] En nombre de Juha Heinanen
Enviado el: jueves, 23 de septiembre de 2010 11:17
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: users at lists.kamailio.org
Asunto: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question



Ricardo Martinez writes:



> I’m wondering how the “Weight” column in the LCR ‘gw’ table Works.



weight is probabilistic weight of the gateway that applies when

priorities of the gateways are the same.



> If I have 100 calls, I was expecting was to have 20 to GW05, 20 to GW06,
20

> to GW09 and 20 to GW10

>

> Finalle 10 to GW02 and 10 to GW02.

>

> Is this the correct interpretation of this parameter?



you don't get exactly those numbers.  what did you observe?



-- juha



_______________________________________________

SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list

sr-users at lists.sip-router.org

http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100923/60ea0989/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 35146 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100923/60ea0989/attachment-0001.png>