[SR-Users] bflag under failure_route (kamailio 1.5)

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

On 10/25/10 6:25 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I know that handling bflags outside of branch_route is not a good
> idea. Anyhow I have a doubt:
>
> 1) In a normal route I set "setbflag(i:1)"

why are you using "i:1"? The parameter must be just 1.

> , so the bflag will be set
> for all the branches that could be generated  for this incoming
> transaction. This also involves creating new branches manually under
> failure_route, am I right?
> Note: I do know that it would be much better just to use flag instead of bflags.
>
> 2) The outgoing transaction(s) fail so I enter into failure_route. If
> I inspect here bflag(i:1) will it be set or not? I remember that it
> will be set.
>
> 3) Then I call append_branch in failure_route, or perhaps call
> loockup("location") and I expect that all the generated branches will
> have the bflag set, am I right?
never used in this way, but the normal usage is per branch and when you 
do it in the main route then it is just for first branch.

Cheers,
Daniel
> Thanks a lot.
>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com