[SR-Users] Record-route issue in Kamailio 3.0.3

[Sergey Okhapkin]

Is Record-Route: a,b,c

analog of

Record-Route: a
Record-Route: b
Record-Route: c

or

Record-Route: c
Record-Route: b
Record-Route: a

?

On Thursday 14 October 2010, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Morten Isaksen writes:
> > When OpenSer sends the message to Kamailio the recourd-routes look like
> > this:
> >
> > Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>
> > Record-Route: <sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>
> >
> > But when the message comes back from Kamailio it is:
> > Record-Route:
> > <sip:x.x.248.7;lr=on;ftag=3d9e7d131b;did=584.1a683a45>,<sip:x.x.248.20;r2
> >=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d131b>,<sip:x.x.248.20;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr;ftag=3d9e7d
> >131b>
> >
> > OpenSER forwards the message to the OCS with Record-route unchanged
> > and the OCS gets confused and does not reply.
> 
> then file a bug to ocs folks, because ocs should understand r-r header
> that contains more than one entry.
> 
> -- juha
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>