[SR-Users] rtpproxy_offer() and rtpproxy_answer() missing in 3.0.x

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Tue Nov 30 16:49:00 CET 2010



On 11/30/10 3:25 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Jeremya<jeremy at electrosilk.net>  wrote:
>> Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> They should exist.  Are you sure you aren't using the git HEAD, where
>>> they have been moved into the "rtpproxy" module?
>>>
>>> On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Jeremya<jeremy at electrosilk.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.0.x/modules_k/nathelper.html
>>>>
>>>> refers to functions rtpproxy_offer() and rtpproxy_answer()  But I get an
>>>> error when using them in my script.
>>>>
>>>> Are these not available in 3.0.x?
>>>>
>> I'm not quite sure which version I'm using at the moment - possibly git
>> HEAD but I'm not near the system to check.
>>
>> In git HEAD are rtpproxy_offer and rtpproxy_answer aliases to
>> force_rtp_proxy? Or do they provide different functionality?
> force_rtp_proxy was removed completely from HEAD as some of the
> functionality was deprecated.
> Please use rtpproxy_offer/answer as it provides better wrapping around
> the internal forcertpproxy function.
>
> A short recap:
> In 3.0 everything was in nathelper.
> In 3.1 all rtpproxy functionality was moved to the new rtpproxy module
> and part of the code was reworked (integration with the core sdp
> parser).
> In the upcoming 3.2 (today's HEAD) the force_rtp_proxy was removed.
>
> It seems that the README files for 1.6 are still pointing to the dev version.
> Daniel, can you check and correct this?
probably this is a left over after release of 1.5 -- we had no 1.6. I 
will check and remove if it is there.

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list