[SR-Users] SIP Routing Logic in Lua

[Jeremya]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/10 8:27 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>> 2010/11/17 Daniel-Constantin Mierla<miconda at gmail.com>:
>>> I made an easy-to-do tutorial where all the SIP routing logic is
>>> implemented
>>> in a Lua script (including authentication, accounting, registrar, user
>>> location). You can read it at:
>>>
>>> http://asipto.com/u/h
>> sr.tm.t_check_trans()
>> sr.sl.send_reply(404, "Not here")
>> sr.tm.t_relay()
>> sr.rr.loose_route()
>> [...]
>>
>> I'd strongly would like that kamailio config file uses namespaced
>> functions as well, as it's an ellegant way to realize of which module
>> each function belongs to.
>> There are more and more modules and new functions, and it's becoming
>> rather difficult to understand a kamailio/SR script with so many
>> functions sharing the same/unique "namespace".
>>
>>    function_name    =>     module.function_name
>>
>> It's cool, it's easy, it's sexy :)
> This should not be that complex, there is no function name that has
> '.' in order to have current conflicts to solve. My concern is related
> to modules with very long names, but seems that most of such cases do
> not export lot of functions (e.g., presence_*).
>
> Alternative is to introduce a short id for modules, eg,:
>
> ps => presence
> rp => rtpproxy
>
> to be used only when module name is too long.
>
> Btw, this option can speed up a bit the startup, as now resolving a
> function in config means going through all modules and all functions
> in a row. Knowing the module, then the search will be only within the
> list of functions exported by that module. Just a side note, not big
> influence over all, this being done at startup.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>>
>> BTW the article showing the LUA usage is brilliant :)

As an aside, is there a current index of functions available? i.e. given
a function what module is it from and what it does?