[SR-Users] Handle '486 busy here' from upstream carrier

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2010/11/15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
> I expected the r-uri changes as well (serial forking). In regard to this
> similar case, there is a difference between loop detection and spirals,
> maybe sorted out in a follow-up rfc.

Yes, in case the RURI changes (or some other headers as Route) then
it's not loop but a spiral.
However the author of the thread didn't modify the RURI, just created
a new branch and sent it again.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>