[SR-Users] multidomain: running multiple kamailio on one host
MÉSZÁROS Mihály
misi at niif.hu
Tue Nov 9 07:04:13 CET 2010
Hi,
I don't get any reply til yet, after i detailed the problem.
Was my problem description not clear enough, or you agree with me.
I need a confirmation that i am not wrong and this problem can't be
solved with the current multidomain implementation.
Alex, Jiri please state if you agree or disagree with me.
And if i am wrong, then please point out where i am wrong.
Many Thanks!
Misi
2010-11-05 18:19 keltezéssel, MÉSZÁROS Mihály írta:
> 2010-11-05 09:31 keltezéssel, Alex Balashov írta:
>> On 11/05/2010 04:10 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote:
>>> Hello all!
>>>
>>> Is there any known problem to run multiple kamailio/sip-router instance
>>> in one host.
>>> I need this to handle multidomain situation.
>>>
>>> The multidomain what is built in is not satisfactory, because the UA-s
>>> what are from varying vendors.
>>> And some has strange or a very limited SIP implementation.
>>> Some can only register ip address, some can use RFC3263, but some can
>>> use only DNS A record. :(
>>>
>>> Any answer, suggestion appreciated very well!
>>
>> I still don't see why handling multiple domains in a single instance
>> would be a problem.
>>
> I will try to explain where i saw the problem.
> Of course it can be that i am wrong, so AFAIK ..
>
>
> If there is domain atlanta.test with with such a DNS.
>
> $TTL 60
> $ORIGIN atlanta.test.
> @ IN SOA a1.atlanta.test. root.a1.atlanta.test. (
> 2009071301 ; Serial
> 604800 ; Refresh
> 86400 ; Retry
> 2419200 ; Expire
> 604800 ) ; Negative Cache TTL
> ;
> @ IN NS a1
> @ IN NS a2
> a1 IN A 192.168.0.1
> a2 IN A 192.168.0.2
> ;; order pref flags service
> regexp replacement
> @ IN NAPTR 10 10 "s" "SIPS+D2T"
> "" _sips._tcp
> @ IN NAPTR 20 10 "s" "SIP+D2T"
> "" _sip._tcp
> @ IN NAPTR 30 10 "s" "SIP+D2U"
> "" _sip._udp
> ;; Priority Weight Port Target
> _sips._tcp IN SRV 10 0 5061 a1
> _sips._tcp IN SRV 20 0 5061 a2
> _sip._tcp IN SRV 10 0 5060 a1
> _sip._tcp IN SRV 20 0 5060 a2
> _sip._udp IN SRV 10 0 5060 a1
> _sip._udp IN SRV 20 0 5060 a2
>
> * UA type1
> It is implementing RFC3263 correctly. (Very rare such a good
> implementation.)
> so it will send a register
> REGISTER atlanta.test
> To:alice at atalnta.test
> o Correctly this client will use the proxy preference and in
> best case use tcp + tls.
> * UA2
> It is implementing only dns A record support.
> so it will send a register
> REGISTER a1.atlanta.test
> To: alice at a1.atlanta.test
> * UA3
> It is a strange UA resolves everything to ip address.
> so it will send the register
> REGISTER 192.168.0.1
> To: alice at 192.168.0.1
> * UA4
> Maybe there are more case, and can be continued. But till now i
> faced only to the above three cases.
>
>
> Where i saw the problem with kamailio multidomain setup (AFAIK):
> I want to use the three as one "sip routing domain" or i don't know
> how to name it correctly.
> When it saves the AoR <=> Contact bindings to location database
> (mysql), the registrar will create and save the contacts to three
> separated domain according to the above three UA behavior:
>
> * atlanta.test
> * a1.atlanta.test
> * 192.168.0.1
>
> So i must add three times the user in subscriber table for the three
> domain, to allow the user alice to authenticate from any UA.
> And i will have three domain in location database for only one "sip
> routing domain".
>
> So if i want to have a second domain, called biloxi.test with similar
> setup, on the same host where atlanta.test is,
> then i get bigger mess. And i have six domain...
> I hope you see where i have a problem.
> And AFAIK i can't set to registrar function save() the domain, if i
> use database backend.
>
> Highly appreciated if You can suggest a solution for this.
> It will be nice if you, or anyone can suggest some solution to this
> problem.
>
> Many Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Misi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20101109/3c2eb986/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list