[SR-Users] TM clarifications Re: CANCEL before INVITE + loose_route()

[Alex Balashov]

On 06/21/2010 03:53 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:

> It the same as when UAC to proxy, as here we are speaking about
> transaction clients which exist in the UAC and the proxy.

Thank you for the clarification.

This is what I thought, but I wondered because philosophically it 
seems to slightly conflict with the requirement that the proxy - even 
a stateful proxy - forward what it receives more or less 
straightforwardly, setting aside the question of forking for the moment.

Thank you, though.  Very helpful.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/