[SR-Users] uac_auth()

Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc at aliax.net
Wed Jun 16 11:45:06 CEST 2010


2010/6/16 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:

> Am I misreading 3261 Section 22.3?
>
>
>      If a proxy were to resubmit a request adding a
>      Proxy-Authorization header field value, it would need
>      to increment the CSeq in the new request.  However, this
>      would cause the UAC that submitted the original request to
>      discard a response from the UAS, as the CSeq value would
>      be different.

I didn't remember such section in RFC 3261. IMHO it's really a dirty
hack and I cannot understand how it can be published in the standard.


> Since the proxy is the authentication actor, I assumed this is how it should
> be done.  On the other hand, if the purpose of the UAC module is to "spoof"
> a challenge response as if it really came from the UAC, I suppose this is
> not appropriate.

That's exactly what I meant :)



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>



More information about the sr-users mailing list