[SR-Users] fix_nated_contact() on REGISTER

[Klaus Darilion]

Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/1/10 9:07 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> No, it'll store the fixed one, in the proper contact column, not the 
>> received column.  I do this all the time, even though it's not the 
>> "proper" way.
> should be the original one with the last version, afaik. There were 
> issues with phones accepting calls which had a different uri than the 
> address they set in contact of register.
> 
> So, the contact details were brocken in:
> - contact - the address from header
> - received - built from source ip and port
> - socket - local socket where the register was received
> 
> Note that there are two functions, fix_nated_contact() and 
> fix_nated_registrar().

I know. I always use fix_nated_register. I just wonder why save() saves 
the fixed contact in case of fix_nated_contact(), because usually we 
have the problem that changes to the message are only visible when the 
message is forwarded (lumps are applied)

regards
Klaus