[Kamailio-Users] What is wrong with this NOTIFY packet

Olle E. Johansson oej at edvina.net
Mon Feb 15 09:30:20 CET 2010


15 feb 2010 kl. 09.25 skrev Asterisk User:

> Hi Group,
> I know this issue has to do bit more with SIP and off from kamailio problems, but just wanted to know your opinions on this.
> I have my sip extensions registered to kamilio and Asterisk works as a voicemail server.
> Now to implement MWI i send NOTIFY packet from Asterisk to Kamailio and from kamailio to SIP extension (Grandstream GXP2000).
> here is the packet that travels from kamailio to extension and the response sent from extension to kamilio.
> ===========================
> NOTIFY sip:1111111 at arzoo.com SIP/2.0
> Max-Forwards: 10
> Record-Route: <sip:172.18.100.74;lr;nat=yes>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.74;branch=z9hG4bK3c3.e1003f03.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:45382;received=172.18.100.73;branch=z9hG4bK.4f83530d;rport=45382;alias
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.73:5060
> From: <sip:111 at arzoo.com>
> To: <sip:1111111 at arzoo.com>
> Contact: <sip:1111111 at arzoo.com>
> Call-ID: 4d61cf9e505d40e905032a18329d61ec at 172.19.100.42
> CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
> User-Agent: VoiceMail
> Event: message-summary
> Content-Type: application/simple-message-summary
> Content-Length: 39
> 
> ===========================
> SIP/2.0 415 Unacceptable Content-Type
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.74;branch=z9hG4bK3c3.02003f03.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:43416;received=172.18.100.73;branch=z9hG4bK.7be73901;rport=43416;alias
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.18.100.73:5060
> Record-Route: <sip:172.18.100.74;lr;nat=yes>
> From: <sip:111 at arzoo.com>
> To: <sip:1111111 at arzoo.com>;tag=3c6ba3e4a93d6864
> Call-ID: 4d61cf9e505d40e905032a18329d61ec at 172.19.100.42
> CSeq: 1 NOTIFY
> User-Agent: Grandstream GXP2000 1.1.4.14
> Accept: application/sdp, application/simple-message-summary, application/octet-stream, application/dialog-info+xml, application/pidf+xml, message/sipfrag;version=2.0
> Content-Length: 0
> 
> ===========================
> Please guide me in right direction to get rid of 'Unacceptable Content-Type' problem.
> Thanks in advance,

The Content-Type that Asterisk is using in the Notify packet is actually listed in the Accept: header of the error message. I would send this as a bug report to Grandstream, unless someone else on the list figures it out.

/O



More information about the sr-users mailing list