[SR-Users] LCR and gateways resource.

[Ricardo Martinez]

Hello Juha.
Thanks for your answer.  I will try something like that.
Question.  The defunct_gw() function works with the gateway selected with
the next_gw() function??

Another question.  How would be the logic to mark a gateway down
automatically in the LCR?.  I mean trying to emulate the "ping" function
from the 1.5 version.

Thanks
Regards,
Ricardo.-



-----Mensaje original-----
De: sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org] En nombre de Juha Heinanen
Enviado el: martes, 28 de diciembre de 2010 12:53
Para: Ricardo Martinez
CC: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Asunto: [SR-Users] LCR and gateways resource.

Ricardo Martinez writes:

> GW1, GW2 and GW3. Let’s suppose also that each gateway is connected to
> digital E1 with 30 channels.  At certain time of the day one of the
> gateways
> is at full capacity using the 30 channels. This is what I wanted to do :
> can
> I have  a variable with the maximum channels available for a certain
> gateway, and for each call going to that gateway a counter?.  When the
> counter reach the maximum, can I remove the gateway from the LCR choosing
> algorithm until it has capacity again?

there is function defunct_gw(period) that you can use to defunct a full
gateway for some period of time.

for what you propose, you would need to use dialog module to keep track
of dialogs to each gateway and that way manage your counters.  then
after calling next_gw(), you could check if its counter allows you to
actually use it.

i'm not myself a believer of dialogs in sip proxy.

-- juha

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users