[SR-Users] some issues with database initialization (berkeley/txt)

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 14:03:22 CET 2010



On 12/27/10 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/10 11:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>>
>>> the LCR module got refurbished and changed completely the database
>>> structure, but the scripts to create the tables for db_text and
>>> db_berkeley engines seem to be not maintained in this case.
>> yes, unless they can be generated automatically from the schema files.
>>
>>
> I tried with dbtext and the lcr tables are created ok.
>
> Noa, what specific version are you using? Seems to be installed from 
> packages, right? Which distro? Then the problem might be in the 
> packaging specs. I did it from sources and all tables are created. Can 
> you send the output of: ls /usr/share/kamailio/dbtext/kamailio/
OK, it proved to be something different -- the new lcr tables for db 
text were not in the remote repository. I had them locally, probably due 
to local db schema generation, so my install worked fine.

I uploaded them on remote repository.

Noa, you need to fetch latest version from git branch 3.1 in order to 
get them (I provided the link to a turorial using git in previous 
message). Over the night, the new nightly debian builds should have them 
included.
>
> Juha, they are automatically generated in the source tree, but 
> sometimes it needs to adjust other files (e.g., kamctl, kamdbctl) when 
> the names of tables change.

Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and 'lcr' be removed?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list