[SR-Users] Wrong handling CANCEL message

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2010/4/30 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
> 200 OK seems correct as long as the transaction is still in memory.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-9.2

I don't agree. As per RFC 3261 when a proxy receives a 200 for an
INVITE the transaction is terminated so a CANCEL after the 200 should
not match such transaction. Then the proxy should reply 481 to the
CANCEL rather than a 200.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>