[SR-Users] possible bug with dialog module

Kelvin Chua kelchy at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 15:15:15 CEST 2010


(gdb) bt
#0  0x00002ab61b62779a in update_dialog_dbinfo (cell=0x2ab61c9100f8) at
dlg_db_handler.c:501
#1  0x00002ab61b628ea8 in dlg_onreply (t=0x7d5228, type=<value optimized
out>, param=<value optimized out>) at dlg_handlers.c:361
#2  0x00002ab617965505 in run_trans_callbacks_internal
(cb_lst=0x2ab61c938830, type=128, trans=0x2ab61c9387c0,
    params=0x7fffec157970) at t_hooks.c:261
#3  0x00002ab61796575e in run_trans_callbacks (type=1, trans=0x88c580,
req=0x0, rpl=0x0, code=477060464) at t_hooks.c:288
#4  0x00002ab61798ebd1 in relay_reply (t=0x2ab61c9387c0, p_msg=<value
optimized out>, branch=0, msg_status=200,
    cancel_bitmap=0x7fffec157dd4, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1705
#5  0x00002ab617990884 in reply_received (p_msg=0x8f48a8) at t_reply.c:2126
#6  0x000000000044760e in forward_reply (msg=0x8f48a8) at forward.c:689
#7  0x000000000047fd22 in receive_msg (
    buf=0x869ec0 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.17.0.202;branch=z9hG4bK75b5.e2a38a16.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.17.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK730bcb55;rport=5060\r\nRecord-Route:
<sip:10.17.0.202;lr=on;did=c85.6d9b66b3>\r"..., len=<value optimized out>,
    rcv_info=0x7fffec158020) at receive.c:257
#8  0x0000000000505e2b in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:520
#9  0x0000000000455adf in main_loop () at main.c:1447
#10 0x0000000000456be2 in main (argc=<value optimized out>,
argv=0x7fffec1582e8) at main.c:2251



(gdb) print cell
$1 = (struct dlg_cell *) 0x2ab61c9100f8



(gdb) print *cell
$2 = {ref = 2, next = 0x0, prev = 0x0, h_id = 996587990, h_entry = 1420,
state = 3, lifetime = 3600, start_ts = 1271816397,
  dflags = 1, sflags = 0, toroute = 0, from_rr_nb = 0, tl = {next = 0x0,
prev = 0x0, timeout = 0}, callid = {
    s = 0x2ab61c910238 "0901b21e13a60e0247988caf7d72f865 at 10.17.0.200sip
:029147089 at 10.17.0.200sip:4153 at hiddendomain.edusip:4153 at 10.17.40.77:5060;user=phone;transport=udpent-Length:
0\r\n\r\n", len = 44}, from_uri = {
    s = 0x2ab61c910264 "sip:029147089 at 10.17.0.200sip
:4153 at hiddendomain.edusip:4153 at 10.17.40.77:5060;user=phone;transport=udpent-Length:
0\r\n\r\n", len = 25}, to_uri = {
    s = 0x2ab61c91027d
"sip:4153 at hiddendomain.edusip:4153 at 10.17.40.77:5060;user=phone;transport=udpent-Length:
0\r\n\r\n", len = 19},
  req_uri = {s = 0x2ab61c910290
"sip:4153 at 10.17.40.77:5060;user=phone;transport=udpent-Length:
0\r\n\r\n", len = 50}, tag = {{
      s = 0x2ab61c91c488
"as50d7852dsip:029147089 at 10.17.0.200<as50d7852dsip%3A029147089 at 10.17.0.200>\034�*",
len = 10}, {s = 0x0, len = 0}}, cseq = {{
      s = 0x2ab61c857950 "10213331\b", len = 3}, {s = 0x0, len = 0}},
route_set = {{s = 0x0, len = 0}, {s = 0x0, len = 0}},
  contact = {{s = 0x2ab61c91c492
"sip:029147089 at 10.17.0.200<sip%3A029147089 at 10.17.0.200>\034�*",
len = 25}, {s = 0x0, len = 0}}, bind_addr = {0x88c580, 0x0},
  cbs = {first = 0x0, types = 0}, profile_links = 0x0}



(gdb) frame 7
#7  0x000000000047fd22 in receive_msg (
    buf=0x869ec0 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.17.0.202;branch=z9hG4bK75b5.e2a38a16.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.17.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK730bcb55;rport=5060\r\nRecord-Route:
<sip:10.17.0.202;lr=on;did=c85.6d9b66b3>\r"..., len=<value optimized out>,
    rcv_info=0x7fffec158020) at receive.c:257
257 forward_reply(msg);



(gdb) print buf+100
$3 = 0x869f24 ".200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK730bcb55;rport=5060\r\nRecord-Route:
<sip:10.17.0.202;lr=on;did=c85.6d9b66b3>\r\nFrom: \"029147089\" <
sip:029147089 at 10.17.0.200 <sip%3A029147089 at 10.17.0.200>>;tag=as50d7852d\r\nTo:
<sip:4153 at hiddendomain.edu <sip%3A4153 at hiddendomain.edu>>;tag=4735210"...



(gdb) print buf+200
$4 = 0x869f88 "\nFrom: \"029147089\"
<sip:029147089 at 10.17.0.200<sip%3A029147089 at 10.17.0.200>>;tag=as50d7852d\r\nTo:
<sip:4153 at hiddendomain.edu
<sip%3A4153 at hiddendomain.edu>>;tag=473521065\r\nCall-ID:
0901b21e13a60e0247988caf7d72f865 at 10.17.0.200\r\nCSeq: 102 INVITE\r\nServer:
Cisco ATA 186  "...



(gdb) print buf+300
$5 = 0x869fec "65\r\nCall-ID:
0901b21e13a60e0247988caf7d72f865 at 10.17.0.200\r\nCSeq:
102 INVITE\r\nServer: Cisco ATA 186  v3.2.0 atasip (041111A)\r\nAllow: ACK,
BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, REGISTER, PRACK, U"...

Kelvin Chua


On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
> wrote:

>  Hello,
>
>
> On 4/21/10 12:23 PM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>
> hi daniel,
>
>  i'm not using git version. so maybe i'm missing some patches. can you
> confirm if what i am
> experiencing is the same problem and the fix is indeed available from the
> git version? thanks
>
>
> I recommend using at least 3.0.1, as a matter of fact 3.0.2 should be
> released soon.
>
> Can you please print the content of cell adn more of the reply in gdb, here
> are the commands:
>
>
> gdb /path/to/kamailio core_file
>
> print cell
>
> print *cell
>
> frame 7
>
> print buf+100
>
> print buf+200
>
> print buf+300
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
>  here is the backtrace:
>
>  #0  0x00002ab61b62779a in update_dialog_dbinfo (cell=0x2ab61c9100f8) at
> dlg_db_handler.c:501
> #1  0x00002ab61b628ea8 in dlg_onreply (t=0x7d5228, type=<value optimized
> out>, param=<value optimized out>) at dlg_handlers.c:361
> #2  0x00002ab617965505 in run_trans_callbacks_internal
> (cb_lst=0x2ab61c938830, type=128, trans=0x2ab61c9387c0,
>     params=0x7fffec157970) at t_hooks.c:261
> #3  0x00002ab61796575e in run_trans_callbacks (type=1, trans=0x88c580,
> req=0x0, rpl=0x0, code=477060464) at t_hooks.c:288
> #4  0x00002ab61798ebd1 in relay_reply (t=0x2ab61c9387c0, p_msg=<value
> optimized out>, branch=0, msg_status=200,
>     cancel_bitmap=0x7fffec157dd4, do_put_on_wait=1) at t_reply.c:1705
> #5  0x00002ab617990884 in reply_received (p_msg=0x8f48a8) at t_reply.c:2126
> #6  0x000000000044760e in forward_reply (msg=0x8f48a8) at forward.c:689
> #7  0x000000000047fd22 in receive_msg (
>     buf=0x869ec0 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 10.17.0.202;branch=z9hG4bK75b5.e2a38a16.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 10.17.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK730bcb55;rport=5060\r\nRecord-Route:
> <sip:10.17.0.202;lr=on;did=c85.6d9b66b3>\r"..., len=<value optimized out>,
>     rcv_info=0x7fffec158020) at receive.c:257
> #8  0x0000000000505e2b in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:520
> #9  0x0000000000455adf in main_loop () at main.c:1447
> #10 0x0000000000456be2 in main (argc=<value optimized out>,
> argv=0x7fffec1582e8) at main.c:2251
>
>
> Kelvin Chua
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> are you using the latest git version of branch kamailio_3.0? It was a fix
>> to dialog after the 3.0.0 release, adding some sanity checks for broken
>> messages:
>>
>> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/sip-router/?a=commit;h=787fabb1e0085355aa1eeb77d5f17e7940f4ed3c
>>
>> On the other hand, I see you got a core dump file:
>>  Apr 21 10:19:57 kamvm-1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28507]: ALERT: <core>
>> [main.c:722]: child process 28511 exited by a signal 11
>> Apr 21 10:19:57 kamvm-1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[28507]: ALERT: <core>
>> [main.c:725]: core was generated
>>
>>  Locate the core file and sent the backtrace. The core is either in root
>> '/' folder or in working directory (if you provided by -w parameter).
>>
>> Use the gdb:
>>
>> gdb /path/to/kamailio core_file
>>
>> then do bt and send here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 4/21/10 11:38 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
>>
>>  ok, i'll enable debug for now.
>> but if it's indeed a buggy UA, the dialog module should not have crashed
>> but instead dropped the dialog/session and moved on, something i think
>> we need to address to be more resilient.
>>
>>  i hope i catch the culprit when this happens again.
>>
>> Kelvin Chua
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net>wrote:
>>
>>> 2010/4/21 Kelvin Chua <kelchy at gmail.com>:
>>>  > i wonder if anybody from list is also experiencing this?
>>>
>>> Perhaps in your case you have a buggy UA setting an invalid Contact
>>> header and it causes Kamailio to crash, maybe the reason others have
>>> not detected same issue.
>>>
>>> Could you get some SIP traces until the problem occurs again?
>>> or perhaps could you enable the debug?
>>>
>>> --
>>>  Iñaki Baz Castillo
>>> <ibc at aliax.net>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
>> http://twitter.com/miconda *
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla * http://www.asipto.com/ *
> http://twitter.com/miconda *
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielconstantinmierla
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20100421/ec34196a/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list