[SR-Users] Appended headers are not added in serial forking

Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com
Wed Apr 21 09:53:39 CEST 2010


On 04/20/2010 05:08 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/4/20 Alex Balashov<abalashov at evaristesys.com>:
>>> Hi, yes, a workaround is adding the headers in branch_route, it works.
>>> However I wonder if the expected behavior is that added headers are
>>> not keep in serial forking. Well, it could make sense. I just want to
>>> confirm.
>>
>> I too am surprised by this.  It seems to me that if headers are added prior
>> to forking, then all existing headers--including the appended ones--should
>> be copied into every new branch.
>
> Hi Alex, read my last mail in this thread in which I explain that the
> error occurs since I used t_newtran() at the begining of the script
> and then "changes on the request that are made after this
> function call will not be saved into transaction!!!" (as the
> documentation says).

Oh.  OK, that is clearer.  Sorry, I was being dumb.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/




More information about the sr-users mailing list