[Kamailio-Users] SIMPLE vs XMPP: The Resolution

Victor Pascual Avila victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 16:25:05 CEST 2009

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> Iñaki Baz Castillo schrieb:
>> 2009/10/7 Juha Heinanen <jh at tutpro.com>:
>>> inaki,
>>> interesting reading.  i haven't been on ietf mailing lists for quite
>>> some time.  perhaps there are no "ietf" people anymore left in ietf sip
>>> related working groups, and they are currently only rubber stamping
>>> oma/ims specifications.  looks to be that way, because no-one responded
>>> to your message.
>>> i don't have anything against oma as long as they don't force me to use
>>> a large number of walled garden servers (like is the case with ims),
>>> whose only purpose is to milk the cow as many times as possible.
>>> perhaps it thus makes sense to adopt from oma specs at least the xml
>>> document specifications.
>> That's exactly my point Juha.
>> I would stop reading OMA specs right now if I suspect they are
>> designed for a closed/vendor/operator environment :)
> IMO does not matter who produces a specs - if it is useful let us use it.

Klaus has gone directly to the point: this is not about religion but
about pragmatism.

Victor Pascual Ávila

More information about the sr-users mailing list