[Serusers] Record-Route issues

[Martin Hoffmann]

Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
> 
> Record-Route headers are inserted into the request, the INVITE in this
> case, and the UAS is suppose to copy the Record-Route header from the
> INVITE into the reply. Which it obviously fails to do.
> In general a proxy like SER is not suppose to change/touch the reply ;-)

I seem to remember that there were quite legal cases where a proxy
messes with the Record-Route it added itself in the reply. Just can't
remember quite what it was.

If one doesn't need the ability of the rr module to store attributes in
the Record-Route header, one should get away with something like 

    append_to_reply("Record-Route: <XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060;nat=yes>\r\n");

in this case.

Regards,
Martin