[Kamailio-Users] LCR Documentation

[Fabian Borot]

I think that this arrangement should work, 3 gws with different "tags", it
should do a load balancing among the 3 gws and append an specific "tag" to
each gw
556233 for gw1
1 for gw2
nothing for gw3

I do not know about using "#" as part of the URI,

regards

jp


lcr routes
+----+-----------------+----------+--------+----------+
| id | prefix          | from_uri | grp_id | priority |
+----+-----------------+----------+--------+----------+
| 1  | 5555551212      |          |      1 |        1 |
| 2  | 5555551212      |          |      2 |        1 |
| 3  | 5555551212      |          |      3 |        1 |
+----+-----------------+----------+--------+----------+
lcr gateways
+-----------+--------------+------+------------+-----------+--------+-------+-------+-------+
| gw_name   | ip_addr      | port | uri_scheme | transport | grp_id | strip
| tag   | flags |
+-----------+--------------+------+------------+-----------+--------+-------+-------+-------+
| gw1    | ip_gw_1   | 5060 |          1 |         1 |      1 |     0
|556233 |     0 |
| gw2       | ip_gw_2   | 5060 |          1 |         1 |      2 |     0 | 1
    |     0 |
| gw3       | ip_gw_3   | 5060 |          1 |         1 |      3 |     0 |
    |     0 |
+-----------+--------------+------+------------+-----------+--------+-------+-------+-------+
[root at proxy1 ~]#
[root at proxy1 ~]#


On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Geoffrey Mina <geoffreymina at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Thanks! I hadn't seen that before.  I have another semi-related
> question about LCR.  I have multiple gateways, each require me to
> prefix the dial string with a specific account ID or rule.
>
> i.e. to dial the phone number 5555551212 I would need to do the following:
>
> gateway 1:
> #556233#5555551212 at mygateway1.com
>
> gateway 2:
> +15555551212 at mygateway2.com
>
> gateway3 :
> 5555551212 at mygateway3.com
>
> Is there any way the LCR system can account for this, or will I need
> to build some custom functionality to make this work?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoff
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 03/05/2009 09:03 PM, Geoffrey Mina wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >> I am currently deploying the LCR module.  I have some questions about
> >> fields and what they do... I searched the docs, but couldn't find
> >> anything.  Can someone please fill in the blanks?
> >>
> >
> > have you seen (I forced a regeneration to be sure is up to date):
> > http://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-devel.html#GEN-DB-GW
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >> [LCR Gateways]
> >> Gateway Name: description of the gateway
> >> Group ID: Numeric identifier used to link LCR Rules
> >> IP Address: The IP of the SIP gateway
> >> Hostname: The hostname of the SIP gateway (not required if IP
provided?)
> >> Port: The port the SIP gateway listens on
> >> URI Scheme: (well documented) NULL = sip, 1 = sip and 2 = sips
> >> Transport: (well documented) NULL = none, 1 = udp, 2 = tcp, 3 = tls,
> >> and 4 = sctp
> >> Strip: ?
> >> Tag: ?
> >> Weight: ?
> >> Ping: ?
> >> Flags: ?
> >>
> >> [LCR Rules]
> >> Prefix: The matching prefix.  In the US most would do this by area
> >> code, so I would assume I would put something like 1678 or 1770 to
> >> route Atlanta calls.  Would putting a NULL or Empty String force a
> >> default route for everything?
> >> >From URI: If I don't care about the from URI can I leave this NULL or
> >> BLANK?
> >> Group ID: The numeric identifier matching to LCR Gateways
> >> Priority: I am assuming if there are 2 records which match the prefix
> >> and from URI the high priority will be chosen first?
> >>
> >> Also, say for example, one of my gateway providers has a primary and a
> >> secondary gateway.  If the primary is down I need to route calls to
> >> the secondary.  How would this fit into an LCR scheme? Would I need
> >> duplicate routes for the secondary with a lower priority?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Geoff
> >>
> >> p.s. for anyone holding out, I just installed Siremis today and it
> >> rocks!  I am really quite pleased with the solution.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> >> Users at lists.kamailio.org
> >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > http://www.asipto.com
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20090305/53c5ffa3/attachment.htm>