[Kamailio-Users] NAThelper and multipart SDP
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Jun 24 22:44:17 CEST 2009
Alex Balashov wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 06/22/2009 11:37 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> [...]At the same time, the Kamailio leadership appears to have much
>>> more perspective and standardisation on rtpproxy, as well as whatever
>>> RTP forwarding module is being lifted from IPTel.org for SIP-Router.
>>
>> rtpproxy does more now than packet forwarding (e.g., playing audio,
>> moh, repacketization ...), therefore needs to stay in user space, see:
>> http://www.rtpproxy.org.
>
> I did not mean to suggest that it is a liability of rtpproxy that it is
> implemented in userspace.
>
> Someone does need to do a study to see if kernel vs. userspace
> forwarding really makes that much of a difference, though. I suspect
> that although it does make a difference, it is not nearly as much of a
> difference as is commonly thought.
>
> Perhaps I will do this study at Evariste and publish the results. The
> problem is I do not know of a good load-testing tool that generates
> bidirectional media. There is SIPP, but it is good for signaling and,
> at best, instantiating one-way media flows only, and also has the
> problem of making the far-end endpoint the limiting factor. Is it
> possible to set up SIPP or something like it (open source?) on two
> endpoints and make them set up calls between themselves with media in
> both directions?
There is pjsip-perf, but I do not know if it supports RTP too.
klaus
More information about the sr-users
mailing list