[SR-Users] [Kamailio-Users] new module: mi_rpc

Klaus Darilion klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Mon Jul 13 20:18:28 CEST 2009


Hi guys!

It would be great if you could write a small page on the wiki shortly 
describing the interfaces into sip-router/kamailio and the difference 
between the "ser way" and "kamailio way"
(mi_*, xmlrpc, fifo? (still alive?), statistics ...)

thanks
klaus

Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> 
>  > here is what mi_rpc modules does:
>  > - it receives a rpc handler form the rpc interface in core
>  > - reads first parameter and then lookups MI command, if not found then 
>  > returns error, if found:
>  > - reads all parameters as string and build internal MI tree
> 
> ok, after andrei fixed some bug, i got stats working via mi_rpc and
> xmlrpc module interface.
> 
> all stats except "tm:", which is now implemented using tm.stats command.
> 
> res = c.tm.stats()
> 
> provides this kind of result:
> 
> {'2xx': 0, 'created': 0, '5xx': 0, 'delayed_free': 0, 'current': 0, 'total_local': 0, 'waiting': 0, '6xx': 0, '4xx': 0, '3xx': 0, 'total': 0, 'replied_locally': 0, 'freed': 0}
> 
> whereas mi based stat results look like this:
> 
> ['200 OK\n', '+ :: core:rcv_requests = 3', '+ :: core:rcv_replies = 0', '+ :: core:fwd_requests = 0', '+ :: core:fwd_replies = 0', '+ :: core:drop_requests = 0', '+ :: core:drop_replies = 0', '+ :: core:err_requests = 0', '+ :: core:err_replies = 0', '+ :: core:bad_URIs_rcvd = 0', '+ :: core:unsupported_methods = 3', '+ :: core:bad_msg_hdr = 0']
> 
> would it be possible to get the result in same (preferable the former)
> format in both cases? 
> 
> -- juha
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users





More information about the sr-users mailing list