[Kamailio-Users] Carrierroute issue
michel freiha
michofr at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 22:27:28 CEST 2009
Dear Uriel,
I found it...The problem was in the makefile of carrierroute module...I did
Chged the following:
DEFS+=$(CONFUSEDEFS)
LIBS=$(CONFUSELIBS)
TO:
DEFS+=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lconfuse
It seems that carrierroute needs that in order to be compiled on Solaris
Thanks a lot for the help
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 10:32 PM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Uriel,
>
> It worked fine as you mentionned below and Y.Y.Y.Y is used when I changed
> the domain to 1 on X.X.X.X
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <
> uriel.rozenbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's really weird. Try changing the domain on the X.X.X.X host to 1, so
>> you only have Y.Y.Y.Y host available as first option.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:07 PM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Sir,
>>>
>>> I did 2 calls from the same endpoint to the same number and get 2
>>> different IDs but still forwarding the calls to X.X.X.X as follow:
>>>
>>> Call1:
>>>
>>> call-id for this call 56549e09d94c1430Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607]
>>> DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default, id 5
>>> Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
>>> default, domain 0 : 0
>>> Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] DBG:carrierroute:rewrite_on_rule: searching for
>>> matching routing rulesJul 30 17:00:32 [10607] DBG:core:hash_func: hash:
>>> 1307293616 % -2147483648 = 1307293616
>>> Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607] INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri 009613089187
>>> was rewritten to sip:001232333333 at X.X.X.X
>>>
>>> Call2:
>>> call-id for this call 063197524438d55dJul 30 17:02:18 [10605]
>>> DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default, id 5
>>> Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: tree
>>> default, domain 0 : 0
>>> Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] DBG:carrierroute:rewrite_on_rule: searching for
>>> matching routing rulesJul 30 17:02:18 [10605] DBG:core:hash_func: hash:
>>> 931879127 % -2147483648 = 931879127
>>> Jul 30 17:02:18 [10605] INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri 009613089187
>>> was rewritten to sip:001232333333 at X.X.X.X
>>>
>>> Any suggestions?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <
>>> uriel.rozenbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The random value is based on the Call-ID, use debug=4 and add an XLOG as
>>>> follows before every call to cr_route:
>>>>
>>>> xlog("L_ERR", "call-id for this call $ci");
>>>>
>>>> Check the call-id is different every time and the CRC32 algorithm to
>>>> calculate the hash values gives a different answer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:49 AM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> When restarting kamailio I found out that it reads both routes
>>>>>
>>>>> Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor: hashless
>>>>> rule with host Y.Y.Y.Y hash hash_index 1
>>>>> Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor: hashless
>>>>> rule with host X.X.X.X hash hash_index 2
>>>>>
>>>>> I jjst do not know why it's not reading the prob
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:39 PM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find below carrierroute table...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
>>>>>> | id | carrier | domain | scan_prefix | flags | mask | prob | strip |
>>>>>> rewrite_host | rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffix | description |
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
>>>>>> | 1 | 5 | 0 | 00 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 |
>>>>>> X.X.X.X | | | NULL |
>>>>>> | 2 | 5 | 0 | 00 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | 0 |
>>>>>> Y.Y.Y.Y | | | NULL |
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +----+---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+-------+--------------+----------------+----------------+-------------+
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> on kamailio.conf:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if(!cr_route("default", "0", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")){
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sl_send_reply("403", "Not allowed");
>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>> # In cas of failure, re-route the request
>>>>>> t_on_failure("1");
>>>>>> # Relay the request to the gateway
>>>>>> t_relay();
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When trying to call 00123456666 the call is forwarded all the time to
>>>>>> X.X.X.X IP and never to Y.Y.Y.Y IP...why this happening? It's like Kamailio
>>>>>> is not reading prob field
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <
>>>>>> uriel.rozenbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm really not sure how it works when you use a 0 prob.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try something like 50/50 and check if the requests go to both
>>>>>>> servers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also, some extract from /var/log/messages will help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:38 AM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear Sir,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My tables are defined as below:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *carrierroute table:*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> id carrier domain scan_prefix flags mask
>>>>>>>> prob strip rewrite_host
>>>>>>>> 19 5 1 00 0
>>>>>>>> 0 0 0 IP_address1
>>>>>>>> 19 5 1 00 0
>>>>>>>> 0 1 0 IP_Address1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *route_tree table:*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> id carrier
>>>>>>>> 5 default
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *In kamalio.cfg:*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if(!cr_route("default", "1", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")){
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The issue is that kamailio is forwarding all calls to IP_Address1
>>>>>>>> and never to IP_Address2 even if prob is 1 for IP_Address2 and 0 for
>>>>>>>> IP_Address1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any help please?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum <
>>>>>>>> uriel.rozenbaum at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Michel,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The prob field is to set the proportion of a certain entry to be
>>>>>>>>> taken when you are load balancing between carriers.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To perform an overflow operation you have to use the domain field.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Check the samples on the module documentation; it's preety clear
>>>>>>>>> there; if you have further questions just post them here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rgds,
>>>>>>>>> Uriel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:39 AM, michel freiha <michofr at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm using carrierroute module and ie seems that it's not working
>>>>>>>>>> well...Suppose I have 2 entries in carrierroute table...Entry 1 with scan
>>>>>>>>>> prefix 00 and prob 0 and a second entry with scan prefix 00 and prob=1...As
>>>>>>>>>> soon as i make a call, this call will be forwarded to the entry with prob 0
>>>>>>>>>> because i guess it appears before the one with prob 1 in the table...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> When starting Kamailio I got the below:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 1, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> not found, add it
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree
>>>>>>>>>> default has 1 trees
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] DBG:carrierroute:add_route_tree: tree 0Jul
>>>>>>>>>> 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: created route tree: 0,
>>>>>>>>>> with id 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> , prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 011, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 00, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 111, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 00, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> , prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 011, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> 011, prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: adding prefix
>>>>>>>>>> , prob -14931260.000000
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:get_route_tree: found
>>>>>>>>>> domain 0
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route: found route,
>>>>>>>>>> now adding
>>>>>>>>>> Jul 29 12:30:11 [23143] INFO:carrierroute:add_route_rule: no
>>>>>>>>>> backed up rules
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It seems that kamailio is not reading probability entry in carrier
>>>>>>>>>> route table
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please find below carrierroute table structure:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `carrierroute` (
>>>>>>>>>> `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
>>>>>>>>>> `carrier` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
>>>>>>>>>> `domain` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
>>>>>>>>>> `scan_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
>>>>>>>>>> `flags` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
>>>>>>>>>> `mask` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
>>>>>>>>>> `prob` float NOT NULL default '0',
>>>>>>>>>> `strip` int(11) unsigned NOT NULL default '0',
>>>>>>>>>> `rewrite_host` varchar(128) NOT NULL default '',
>>>>>>>>>> `rewrite_prefix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
>>>>>>>>>> `rewrite_suffix` varchar(64) NOT NULL default '',
>>>>>>>>>> `description` varchar(255) default NULL,
>>>>>>>>>> PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
>>>>>>>>>> ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1 AUTO_INCREMENT=23 ;
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can someone help me to find this issue?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20090730/5be5b351/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list