[Kamailio-Users] preparing kamailio 1.5.2

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

thanks for testing and reporting back.

Please cc all the time to the list, so everybody interested gets updated 
about conclusions.

Daniel

On 14.07.2009 0:05 Uhr, Marco Bungalski wrote:
> Hello, Daniel!
>
> Thank you for you documentation - with this my linux-knowledge increased .-)
>
>
> I've just downloaded an testet - now Kamailio don't crash with a loaded
> dialog-module after  
> a receive of SIP-message containing an empty record-route-field. So good
> luck for tomorrow :)
>
> Message now:
> Jul 13 23:59:37 [23474] ERROR:core:print_rr_body: failed to parse RR
> Jul 13 23:59:37 [23474] ERROR:dialog:populate_leg_info: failed to print
> route records
>
>
> Thanks and  cheers,
>
> Marco
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 17:05
> An: Marco Bungalski; kamailio
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Kamailio-Users] preparing kamailio 1.5.2
>
> Hello Marco,
>
> On 13.07.2009 14:28 Uhr, Marco Bungalski wrote:
>   
>> Hello, Daniel,
>>
>> i know how to compile, but where to download the version with the bugfix
>> included?
>>   
>>     
> if you fetch from svn the branch 1.5 then it has the fix. Here is a 
> short description of how the versioning was done so far for kamilio 
> (openser) from svn:
> - when a major version is released, a branch with the first two numbers 
> in the version is created (e.g., 1.5)
> - for each minor version (including the .0 - corresponding to the major 
> version) a tag is created with name of the three numbers in version
> - any fix for the major version is committed in the branch. Once a new 
> minor release is out, a new tag is created. Therefore, the branch has 
> all the time the most updated code for a specific major release. The 
> tags are snapshots at the time of release.
>
> For the case of 1.5.x series:
> - there is one branch 1.5
> - now there are two tags on svn: 1.5.0 and 1.5.1, soon there will be 1.5.2.
> - the tarballs are created from a svn checkout done as exampled in the 
> wiki page I sent to you.
>
> probably reading a bit about svn (subversion) will help you. Anyhow, 
> next major version will use GIT.
>
> Now, just to download the latest 1.5.x version, do:
> svn co http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.5 
> kamailio-1.5
>
> You need subversion package installed. The continue installation as you 
> do with the tarball.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>   
>> Hello,
>>
>> this one should help you:
>> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-1.5.x-from-svn
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 07/13/2009 01:30 PM, Marco Bungalski wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> Hello, 
>>>
>>> i am sorry to say that i've not testet it because i don't know where to
>>> download the fix and how to implementate that :-(
>>>
>>> But if you give me a link i will test it today (i can simulate the bug)
>>>     
>>>       
>> and
>>   
>>     
>>> will send you a feedback.
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Marco
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>>>  
>>> Marco Bungalski
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Marco Bungalski GmbH
>>> Traversale 5
>>> 27283 Verden
>>>  
>>> Telefon: +49 4231 - 776 9999
>>> Fax: +49 4231 - 776 9998
>>> Mobil: +49 172 4204774
>>>  
>>> e-mail: Marco at Bungalski.de
>>> web: www.bungalski.de
>>>  
>>> Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Marco Bungalski 
>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: D-27283 Verden, AG Walsrode HRB 120586
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com] 
>>> Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juli 2009 12:32
>>> An: Marco Bungalski
>>> Cc: users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> Betreff: Re: [Kamailio-Users] preparing kamailio 1.5.2
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> On 07/13/2009 12:28 PM, Marco Bungalski wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Hello, Daniel!
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Will the bug "Kamailio crashes when receiving an empty 
>>>> Record-Route-field with using the dialog-module" be fixed in 1.5.2?
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> If yes: Thanks for that :-)
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> it should be already in the svn (therefore yes). Have you tested it?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>   
>>     
>
>
>