[Kamailio-Users] [SR-Users] force_rtp_proxy() vis-a-vis BYE

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2009/7/8 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
>>  From what seems here, definitely does not deal with PATH extension.
>
> I think the concept of nat_traversal correctly is focused on using outbound
> proxies - e.g. you have several outbound proxies (multiple SRV or A records)
> which relay the signaling to the core proxies (registrars, presence servers
> ...).
>
> In such a setup there is no need for PATH support as the nat_traversal will
> be done on the outbound proxy.

I don't understand this. PATH is required when a registration is done
through an outbound proxy, so the registrar routes request for that
AoR using also through the outbound proxy (the RURI is the Contact of
the REGISTER but the request is sent to the OBP.


-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>