[Kamailio-Users] stun/outbound draft...

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 01/09/2009 01:06 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> "but... if we solve NAT issue in this document...
> what could be writte in the future?
>   

well, on the other hand is not bad. You would have been probably 
unemployed (or in other business) now if the SIP would have been simple.

I am thinking of SIP as developer's heaven -- never run out of new tasks.

It is an amazing business/money flow environment:
- voip/++ services
- developing
- teaching
- conformance testing
- rfc writing
- and you can still add...

Daniel


>
>   
>> ICE came too late, the are millions of end user devices sold out there,
>> without it. And as "workarounds" are in place, nobody will invest now
>> (crisis :-) ?!?!) to replace them -- only the time will obsolete them.
>> So we still have to stick to the solutions we have now.
>>     
>
> The good point of ICE is that it works end to end, so you can have a
> proxy that fixes NAT when needed ("Contact" or SDP with private IP).
> ICE will solve it in client side, as STUN, so proxy doesn't need to
> solve NAT in that case. Both methods can live together and this is
> cool since allows ICE implementation.
>
>
>   

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com