[Kamailio-Users] Call Stateful Server

Juan Asencio juan at asencio.dk
Wed Feb 18 13:51:11 CET 2009


Hi Henning, you are right those are the right addresses.

If I compare with your message, so cr rewrites the uri.

It is when I do a ngrep that it keeps using the kamailio ip address.

I will try to send it to a working gateway and see what happens.

:) thanks for your help.

Juan.-

Feb 18 12:40:51 localhost /sbin/kamailio[14765]:
INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri 456789 was rewritten to
sip:456789 at host5.dk-ws
Feb 18 12:40:51 localhost /sbin/kamailio[14765]:
ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: no branch for forwarding
Feb 18 12:40:51 localhost /sbin/kamailio[14765]: ERROR:tm:w_t_relay:
t_forward_nonack failed
Feb 18 12:41:20 localhost /sbin/kamailio[14769]:
CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response: pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for
code 408

> On Wednesday 18 February 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
>> Carrierroute is assigning the correct host address. So I guess that
>> works,
>> but I'm worried about the invite, that is send with ip address of the
>> kamailio, instead of the one assigned by carrierroute.
>>
>> Do you think the address would change if it could find host address
>> assigned by cr?
>
> Hi Juan,
>
>>> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.606688 192.168.50.118:8236 -> 192.168.50.93:5060
>>>   INVITE sip:456789 at 192.168.50.93 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> 192.168.50.118:8236;
>>>
>>> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.611241 192.168.50.93:5060 -> 192.168.50.118:8236
>>>   SIP/2.0 100 Giving a try..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.118:8236;
>>>
>>> U 2009/02/18 12:40:51.612321 192.168.50.93:5060 -> 192.158.50.114:5060
>>>   INVITE sip:456789 at 192.168.50.93 SIP/2.0..Record-Route:
>
> .118 is the address of your test box, .114 the kamailio and .93 the
> gateway?
> Yes, cr should rewrite the request uri to the one in its table. I just
> tested
> with a non existing host name on my system (test.box):
>
> Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: INFO:carrierroute:cr_do_route: uri
> 49721123456787 was rewritten to sip:49721123456787 at test.box:7000, carrier
> 0,
> domain 10
> Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: CRITICAL:core:mk_proxy: could not
> resolve hostname: "test.box"
> Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: ERROR:tm:uri2proxy: bad host name in
> URI
> <sip:49721123456787 at test.box:7000>
> Feb 18 13:26:30 ca ../kamailio[2430]: ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure
> to
> add branches
>
> Cheers,
>
> Henning
>






More information about the sr-users mailing list