[Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] New module : PURPLE - IM/Presence multi-protocol gateway

[Eric PTAK]

Hello everyone,
and thank you for your welcome !

2009/2/3 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>

> Hello,
>
> code will be unfrozen in few weeks. As personal preference, returning code
> is a more flexible way, as the config writer can chose what to send.
>
> Changing the return code for a function is not a new feature IMO. However,
> I mean by that to do it with the current design. If I am not wrong there is
> a pipe communication between sip worker processes and purple worker
> processes.


Yes you're right, purple has it's own process.



> You cannot get the error in purple processes and return it in the sip
> process. What you can do is to have a different reply code if you had an
> error while building the packet for purple process (e.g., no more memory)
> and once you send it to purple process return true and the code writer
> should reply with 202 Message accepted.


My problem is that I currently don't know how to return synchronously a
reply code from the pipe's other side.
Can I use the pipe to write back from the purple process to the "main"
process ?



> Cheers,
> Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20090203/214265fa/attachment.htm>