[Serusers] 200 OK not being ACKnowledged
Steven C. Blair
blairs at isc.upenn.edu
Fri Aug 14 19:08:07 CEST 2009
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Hoffmann [mailto:hn at nvnc.de]
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 11:55 AM
To: Steven C. Blair
Cc: Michal Matyska; serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] 200 OK not being ACKnowledged
Steven C. Blair wrote:
>
> In route block 0 I use the following logic for relaying messages.
>
>
> # Call Tear-Down Section for ACKs - do not account for acks
> if (method=="ACK") {
> xlog("L_INFO", "\n[SER]: --ACK--: Time: [%Tf] From: <%fu> To <%tu> Src IP <%is> Method:<%rm>\n");
> t_relay();
> break;
> };
These ACKs are record routed messages like the BYE and thus should be
forwarded using something like this:
if (loose_route()) {
t_relay();
break
}
loose_route() does all the necessary magic to find out the next hop. You
should have a block like that already somewhere. Just removing the ACK
block should do the trick.
I do but that was not enough. Apparently the CXC was attempting to forward based on the maddr value while SER was using to/from/via headers. Changing the CXC to ignore the maddr header fixed the problem
-Steve
Regards,
Martin
More information about the sr-users
mailing list