[Kamailio-Users] removal of tag-param in To Header

[Klaus Darilion]

Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>:
> 
>>> But I really wonder why you need to remove the To tag in an in-dialog
>>> request.
>>>
>> A common use case is a SIP client which gets confused by multiple early
>> dialogs (e.g. Asterisk in pedenatic mode). Just remove the totags from the
>> responses 101-199 and you are done.
> 
> Wow! Asterisk in pedantic mode (theorically this means more RFC 3261
> compliant) requires To tag in provisional 1XX responses to be removed
> in case of getting forked responses!

At least that was the case ~1 year ago. I have not tried current versions.

And yes - Asterisk is buggy in both modes :-)

klaus

> What will be the next?  requiring just one Via header?  requiring
> media address in SDP being the same as address in Contact header?
> requiring a new propietary header  "Require: x-digium" ?
> 
> Amazing.
>