[Kamailio-Users] In-dialog request correlation without loose routing?

[Alex Balashov]

Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
> 
> Alex Balashov schrieb:
>> Klaus Darilion wrote:
>>> I guess as long as all the clients are loose_routers (final target in 
>>> the RURI) it will work even without loose_route, if you only have 1 
>>> proxy between the clients.
>>>
>>> Of course the forwarded in-dialgo requests will still have an Route 
>>> header which is actually not RFC conform but ignored by allmost all 
>>> SIP clients.
>>
>> So, you're saying it's better to run loose_route() to have it consume 
>> this extraneous Route: header?
> 
> Better? hard to say
> 
> But at least more elegant and standard conform

Well, thank you, I appreciate the insight.  :)

-- 
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599