[Kamailio-Users] Client REGISTERED but "404-NOT FOUND"

luzango mfupe luzango.mfupe at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 09:33:08 CEST 2008


Hi Iak and Victor,
The problem is now solved, the Client appeared to be buggy and not my
Kamailio config.
Cheers,
Lu.
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:26:24 +0200
From: " Victor Pascual ?vila " <victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Client REGISTERED but "404-NOT FOUND"
       during  INVITE
To: " I?aki Baz Castillo " <ibc at aliax.net>
Cc: users at lists.kamailio.org
Message-ID:
       <618e24240810160826l700fbca9gb61e52ed43dc479 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, I?aki Baz Castillo <ibc at aliax.net> wrote:
> 2008/10/15 luzango mfupe <luzango.mfupe at gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>> Hi Mates,
>> I am testing a Client in Nokia E65 using kamailio 1.3.3. I managed to
>> successfull get it Registered but when i attempt to make a call i always
get
>> the "404 Not Found" message in the INVITE. Strangely enough, the Client
>> appears to still be  ONLINE in the location table.
>
> Your conclusion is wrong. A user doen't need to be registered in order
> to make a PSTN call (except if you add that logic to your script, that
> is not the case).
>
> So, forget yuor user is registered, it's doesn't matter, and debug why
> your dialed number is not matched as a number to the PSTN.

I?aki is right here.

In addition, "404 Not Found" is not the correct reponse when the
destination target is not registered, IMO it should be a 480 instead.
--
Victor Pascual ?vila

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:23:19 +0200
From: " I?aki Baz Castillo " <ibc at aliax.net>
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Client REGISTERED but "404-NOT FOUND"
       during  INVITE
Cc: users at lists.kamailio.org
Message-ID:
       <cc1f582e0810160923h5e6f9ffeq2d6bb8452730646b at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

2008/10/16 Victor Pascual ?vila <victor.pascual.avila at gmail.com>:
> In addition, "404 Not Found" is not the correct reponse when the
> destination target is not registered, IMO it should be a 480 instead.

Yeah!!!

404 should be returned when the proxy/UAS received a request and it's
not responsible for it, for example a non existing user (non existing
user != non registered user).
When a user is not registered, but it does exist in the server, the
server must reply "480".

-- 
Luzango Mfupe
TUUNE MOBILE
Tel:0128440528/0123825710
Tshwane-RSA

"...Ships are safe in harbor, but they were never meant to stay
there......."

-- 
Luzango Mfupe
TUUNE MOBILE
Tel:0128440528/0123825710
Tshwane-RSA

"...Ships are safe in harbor, but they were never meant to stay
there......."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20081017/02f77f33/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list