[Serusers] Registering port instead of contact field port

[Daniel Serrano]

Thanks Iñaki,

So bad that my client doesn't support rport. :-(     I have been reading 
about  fix_nated_contact(). Some one have some example of the ser.conf 
using this command?
*

Daniel Serrano  D.** *


Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Jueves, 27 de Noviembre de 2008, Daniel Serrano escribió:
>   
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am using SER as IM server and I found that   the SER use the contact
>> field  to storage the user's location in the memory for future requests.
>> I noted this using the command "serctl alias show" and checking some
>> traces.
>> Since I'm using a NAT scenario I'd like to  use the UDP port that  my
>> SER server receives during the registration  instead of the  contact
>> field  port to reach the users after their registration. Is there any
>> way to do this?
>>     
>
> "rport" does it, but the client must indicate support of "rport" by 
> adding ";rport" parameter to its Via header.
> Anyway, *SER can force it by using "force_rport()".
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20081127/e10e0b6b/attachment.htm>