[Serusers] NAT Traversal issue for IM? Is msilo module necessary to make IM work in SER? SER doesn't forward MESSAGE

[lin9k at yahoo.com]

Hi Tomasz,

Thanks for replying. It looks like I am having a NAT issue? Sometimes it works in one way, and sometimes cannot reach the peer. Will it matter for communicating IM between two NATed peers? I know we have to use some NAT helper or rtpproxy to solve the NAT traversal for voice/video. How about the IM?

Thanks,
Ling



----- Original Message ----
From: Tomasz Zieleniewski <tzieleniewski at gmail.com>
To: lin9k at yahoo.com
Cc: serusers at iptel.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 1:45:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Is msilo module necessary to make IM work in SER? SER doesn't forward MESSAGE

Hi,

msilo module is used for reliable delivery in case when someone is offline.
There has to be something wrong in Your ser.cfg.
Any way I would switch to ser2.0 much more powerful!:)

Regards
Tomasz Zieleniewski

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:05 AM,  <lin9k at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I used two IM (SIMPLE based) clients to communicate through SER. However, I could only see clients kept sending MESSAGE to SER but SER never forwarded them to the peer.
>
> I was not using msilo. I am not sure if that's the cause that SER didn't forward to the other end. Or, do I need any special configuration in ser.cfg, or any different version of SER? I was using ser-0.9.6.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Ling
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers at lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>