[Kamailio-Users] Users Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11

luzango mfupe luzango.mfupe at gmail.com
Tue Nov 4 17:31:33 CET 2008


>   9. Re: the sip router project (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>
>
> Mmmh! guys, i am missing some points here, does this has anything to do
> with OPENSIPS-YATE Collabo? a counter attack move of some sort???
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:24:15 +0200
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan at voice-system.ro>
> Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] the sip router project
> To: Johansson Olle E <oej at edvina.net>
> Cc: devel <devel at lists.kamailio.org>, serusers at lists.iptel.org,
>        sr-dev at lists.sip-router.org, users <users at lists.kamailio.org>,  SER
>        developer mailing list <serdev at iptel.org>,
> business at lists.kamailio.org
> Message-ID: <4910691F.9020509 at voice-system.ro>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi Olle,
>
> Thank you for your thoughts. On a first view, it looks interesting, but I'm
> missing some points here (important points):
>
> 1) as OpenSER was forked from SER because different views (and the OpenSER
> view proved to be a very popular and successful one), I wonder
> why, Kamilio is getting back to SER? not sharing any more the OpenSER view
> as claimed? because such merging will definitely have a great
> impact on the dynamical  and openness of the projects (like releases,
> contributions, driving the project)
>
> 2) this major change of perspective (at least for kamilio) was a backstage
> decision, kept secret from the community - shouldn't be in the
> interest of the community to say if going back to the roots (merging into
> SER) is something wanted or not? it somehow contradicts the self
> existence of OpenSER, right?
>
> 3) the benefits you mentions are mainly optimization of the internal
> project activities and not optimizations of the outcome - what the
> project will deliver. And I guess this is the most important. We already
> went though the experience of  large devel community, frameworks, etc but
> with no outcome for more than 2 years...
>
> >From my personal perspective, the new project looks more like SER
> absorbing Kamilio (considering the sizes, the companies behind each
> project, the resources, and the man-power behind each project).
>
> And at the moment I would like preserve the OpenSER vision and to have an
> open source project (a standalone one), far away from the "control" of any
> Big Brother ;)
>
> Regards,
> Bogdan
>
>
>
> Johansson Olle E wrote:
> > Congratulations to both projects!
> >
> > I think this is very beneificial for both communities as well as for
> > all the companies out there using the two products.
> >
> > I am very happy with this result and hope that the third kid in the
> > SER family - OpenSIPS - will consider joining the effort too.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > /Olle
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at lists.kamailio.org
> > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.kamailio.org
> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> End of Users Digest, Vol 42, Issue 11
> *************************************
>



-- 
Luzango Mfupe
TUUNE MOBILE
Tel:0128440528/0123825710
Tshwane-RSA

"...Ships are safe in harbor, but they were never meant to stay
there......."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20081104/cc5157bb/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list